|
Caption 3
Indicators: Standard II, III including 3.2s, 3.11s, 3.12s, 3.13s, 3.14s, 3.15s, 3.17s, IV and TEKS 7.22s, 7.23s, 7.24s, 8.14s, 9.20s, 10.3s, 10.4s, 10.15s, 10.16s, 10.35s, 10.41s, 11.26s, 11.34s
Artifact #3
Descriptors: Internet information search using Google search engine and sites given in the course; research on video equipment through print sources (Videomaker Magazine); online discussions with classmates to explore video equipment and software pros and cons; budget information compiled into a spreadsheet using Microsoft Excel; budget presented as an Excel file and also as an Adobe pdf for universal readability; use of class discussion emails in formulating answers to the "problem" of developing a budget for a video class with a total figure of $30,000 as specified in our assignment description; revising a previously created budget to include new information gained throughout the video class; and posting as an email in the proper TATC discussion area.
Title: Revised Budget for Video Classroom
Course: 205-1 Extended Video
Date Created: May 21, 2003
Source: Individual TATC project
Media: Posted as email to proper discussion area, Internet information searches, Microsoft Excel spreadsheet, Adobe Acrobat pdf file
Description: This artifact was actually built on a previous budget assignment we had completed earlier in the extended video course. After several assigned discussions that further refined our knowledge of products and their pros and cons, we were asked to revise our budget and discuss the "why" of our changes in our posting. The original discussion gave us a budget limit of $30,000 and challenged us to use it wisely to fund equipment in a video clasroom. We were expected to research and evaluate different software and hardware that can be used in the video class and make informed decisions regarding our budget, and "problem-solve" in the area of budget tradeoffs that we encountered as we worked with our allocated figure.
Rationale: I chose to use this particular artifact for Standard 3 because I used "task-appropriate tools to synthesize knowledge" through my use of the Internet, discussion emails, spreadsheets, and pdf files to create my budget. In addition, I "applied search strategies" and "created and modifed solutions" through the original budget and its revision. I also "evaluated" these results in a way that "supports the works of individuals and groups in problem-solving situations" through my revision and discussion throughout the creation and revision process. Working up a budget is definitely a problem-solving situation that both individual teachers and groups of educators and administrators face!
Implications for future: I will use this standard as I face problematic issues like budgets each year. My teaching assignment for next year is our Career Investigations class for eighth grade students. The TEKS for this course also involve Internet use and problem solving abilities related to exploring careers and discovering students' career interests and aptitudes. I know I will continue to use and teach concepts related to this standard. It is important for teachers to model this standard in their classroom to help teach students the value of using task appropriate tools to problem solve for themselves.
Reviewer's Comments: WOW! You put a lot of long hours into the assignment. Looks like you have all of your information. Great idea, adding the link to the vendor. Will save a lot of trouble later.
Reviewer's Name: Wanda Corn
Title: TATC Learner '02, TATC Mentor '03
Date Reviewed: June 13, 2003
|