Standard V

Instruction that Incorporates Technology

Know how to plan, organize, deliver, and evaluate instruction for all students that incorporates the effective use of current technology for teaching and integrating the Technology Applications Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) into the curriculum.

Reflection:  Developing a Custom Rubric really helped me to understand what to look for in a web site myself.  Along with artifact #4, this standard is covered so well I believe.  I learned how to plan, organize, deliver, and evaluate instruction for my Teacher Help Web Site and I enjoyed learning it all.

Caption 14

Indicators: Standard I, Standard II, Standard III, Standard V, 7.4s, 7.8s, 7.9s, 7.10s, 7.11s, 7.12s, 7.14s, 7.15s, 7.16s, 7.17s, 7.22s, 7.23s, 7.24s, 7.25s, 7.27s, 7.31s, 7.32s, 7.37s, 7.41s, 8.14s, 8.24s, 8.25s, 8.33s, 8.34s, 8.35s, 8.38s, 8.39s, 9.13s, 9.15s, 9.17s, 9.20s, 9.24s, 9.25s, 9.26s, 9.27s, 9.29s, 9.39s, 9.42s, 10.11s, 10.16s, 10.34s, 10.37s, 10.38s, 10.40s, 11.1s, 11.7s, 11.10s, 11.11s, 11.13s, 11.14s, 11.16s, 11.17s, 11.18s, 11.19s, 11.20s, 11.21s, 11.23s, 11.24s, 11.25s, 11.26s, 11.28s, 11.29s, 11.30s, 11.32s, 11.33s, 11.34s, 11.35s, 11.38s, 11.39s.

Artifact #14

Descriptors: Custom Rubric

Title:  Web Site Evaluation Rubric

Course: Extended Web Authoring 202

Date Created: 12/17/02

Source: Individual Project

Media: Web Page

Description:  This is a Custom Rubric created to evaluate the Teacher Help Web Site that is from Standard 11 artifact #4.  I was to determine the required elements for my rubric as it would be applied to my Teacher Help Web Site.  A Rubric is a scoring guide that describes criteria for student performance and differentiates among different levels of performance within those criteria. 

Rationale:  I researched sites that were used to evaluate sites for the web.  The site I used was designed with an educational purpose in mind.  It is cited at the bottom of the web page.  I really liked the way the rubric was put together.  I modified and added my own criteria for evaluating a web site.  I asked permission to use part of her rubric as a guide and she said it was ok. 

Implications for future:  I will use this rubric in my Web Mastering class for my future  students to get a better understanding of what to look for in a web site.  I also think it would be a good idea for my students to determine their own required elements for their own custom rubric.

Reviewer's Comments:  I like the headings you included at the top (unacceptable, weak, strong, etc.).  That is probably something I should try to tie in with my rubric.

Reviewer Name:  Lorri D. Doubrava

Title:  TATC Student

Date Reviewed:  12/18/02