body.htm

Final Portfolio Criteria Checklist

Consensus Judgment

I. Portfolio includes clearly labeled artifacts which demonstrate competency in all areas designated for the program.

TA Standard VI:

___Digital Graphics/Animation

___Does not meet minimum standards. Mostly personal information, no coursework artifacts. Artifacts demonstrate an insufficient use of the technology application TEKS. Most artifacts merely decorate and seem random or unrelated. May lack sufficient or meaningful integration with items merely "packaged" together. (1)

___Meets minimum standards. Few examples of coursework, field experience, and interests. Artifacts demonstrate a limited use of the technology application TEKS. Some artifacts may miss some important opportunities to include sufficient and meaningful integration and may be merely "packaged" together. (2)

___Exceeds minimum standard. Many examples of coursework, lessons, related field experiences, and interest. Artifacts demonstrate a limited but sufficient and effective use of the technology application TEKS. The role of most artifacts included serve to communicate. Indicates the capable and sufficient use of the tool's features and capabilities. (3)

___Far exceeds minimum standards. Good examples of coursework, lessons, related field experience, and interests. Artifacts demonstrate an expanded, detailed and sophisticated and integrated use of the technology application TEKS. The role of the artifacts included serve to communicate. Indicates (not necessarily) the use of the majority of the tool's features and capabilities. (4)

TA Standard VIII:

___Web Authoring

___Does not meet minimum standards. Mostly personal information, no coursework artifacts. Artifacts demonstrate an insufficient use the of technology application TEKS. Most artifacts merely decorate and seem random or unrelated. May lack sufficient or meaningful integration with items merely "packaged" together. (1)

)

TA Standard VIII:

___Multimedia

TA Standard IX:

___Desktop Publishing

TA Standard X:

___Video Technology

TA Standards I-V:

___TA Standard I

___TA Standard II

___TA Standard III

___TA Standard IV

___TA Standard V

II. Portfolio organization is meaningful, original, and constructed to facilitate review.

___Does not meet minimum standards. Errors are so numerous and serious that they interfere with communication and it is difficult to tell what the student is saying. 5-10 links don't work, many dead ends, links not clear, all linear, numerous spelling errors. Little or no originality is shown in the overall concept. (1)

___Meets minimum standards. There are few major and minor errors but the meaning is still clear. 3-4 links don't work, some links go to dead ends, links are labeled, easy to navigate site, few spelling errors. Sparks of originally are displayed (2)

___Exceeds minimum standard. There are few minor errors but no major errors and the meaning is crystal clear and accurate. A clear percentage of links work, links are clearly labeled, profoundly easy to navigate site, minor spelling errors. The whole portfolio is developed around an original theme. (3)

___Far exceeds minimum standards. There are no errors and the meaning is distinctly clear and precise. Multi-linked pages, all links work, links clearly labeled with explanations, no spelling errors. The portfolio exhibits a high level of originality in its concept and theme. (4)

III. Documentation is complete and consistent.

___Does not meet minimum standards. Errors in required documentation are numerous and serious in not being completed or consistent as prescribed by the portfolio guidelines. (1)

___Meets minimum standards. There are few major and minor errors in the required documentation as to their completeness and/or consistency. (2)

___Exceeds minimum standards. There are few minor errors but no major errors in the required documentation as to their completeness and/or consistency. (3)

___Far exceeds minimum standards. There are no errors in the required documentation as to their completeness and/or consistency. (4)

IV. Portfolio demonstrates thoughtful, in-depth reflection on processes and products.

___Does not meet minimum standards. Few captions, mostly descriptive not telling why pieces were included. (1)

___Meets minimum standard. Adequate captions but greater depth of reflection needed. (2)

___Exceeds minimum standards. Good use of captions with greater depth of reflection. (3)

___Far exceeds minimum standard. Excellent captions provide links between experiences and learning theory, thoughtful reflections explain why pieces included. (4)

V. Portfolio includes all required materials:

___Introduction

___Table of contents

___Professional Goals Statement

___Current resume

___Field Experience/Observation

___Captioned Artifacts (10-15 recommended)

___Designation/Rationale of "Best Work"

___Reflective final paper

___Does not meet minimum standards. One of more items missing. (1)

___Meets minimum standards. All items present with sufficient explanation of navigational directions. (2)

___Exceeds minimum standard. All items present with expanded areas of interest. Complete and accurate navigational directions including descriptions of each of the components. (3)

___Far exceeds minimum standards. Expanded items of interest with a clear depth and breadth of the whole portfolio experience. Precise navigational directions to a complex portfolio. (4)

VI. Portfolio is submitted to the Review Committee in a timely and professional manner.

Date _______

___Does not meet minimum standards. Pass pre-announced due date. No accessible web address given.

___Meets minimum standards. Submitted for review on or before the due date with a web accessible address furnished.

___Exceeds minimum standards. Submitted for review on or before the due date with a web accessible address furnished. An alternative form of the portfolio is supplied.

___Far exceeds minimum standards. Submitted for review on or before the due date with a web accessible address furnished. An alternative form of the portfolio encompassing a variety of platforms is supplied. Site maps are provided of the portfolio.

VII. Portfolio is presented to reviewers in a timely and professional manner.

Evaluator _________________________________________________

___Does not meet minimum standards. Does not present the portfolio or shows every component item by item and does not present an understanding as to their relationship to the standards or the learning. Goes over the time limit. (1)

___Meets minimum standards. Presentation focuses on highlighting the program experience. Presents within time limits set forth. (2)

___Exceeds minimum standards. Presentation focuses in a concise manner on highlighting the program experience. Presents within time limits set forth. (3)

___Far exceeds minimum standards. Presentation focuses on the scope of the program by highlighting key elements of the program experience. Presents within time limits set forth. (4)

Overall Physical Portfolio

Evaluator _________________________________________________

Date __________________

Satisfactory Review
Unsatisfactory Review

Does not meet minimum standards
Meets minimum standards
Exceeds minimum standard
Far exceeds minimum standards

Portfolio Score _______________

___Does not meet minimum standards. Must not have a qualifier in any of the criteria with a "Does not meet minimum standards". (portfolio score - cumulative score of all criteria) Unsatisfactory Review.

___Meets minimum standards. Must have a qualifier in all areas of the criteria with a "Meets minimum standards" or any four criteria above that. (portfolio score -cumulative score of all criteria) Satisfactory Review.

___Exceeds minimum standard. Must have a qualifier in all areas of the criteria with a "Meets minimum standards" or any eight criteria above that, including at least two "Far exceeds minimum standards" qualifiers. (portfolio score -cumulative score of all criteria) Satisfactory Review.

___Far exceeds minimum standards. Must have a qualifier in all areas of the criteria with a "Meets minimum standards" or any eleven criteria above that, including at least five "Far exceeds minimum standards" qualifiers. (portfolio score -cumulative score of all criteria) Satisfactory Review.

Reviewe Name _____________________________

Portfolio Coordinator ___________________________Date:__________________

Submitted Date: _________________

Resubmission Date: ____________________

return to Portfolio Review section of guidelines