|
|
Exceptional
4
|
Admirable
3
|
Acceptable
2
|
Amateur
1
|
|
Research
|
Went above and beyond to research information; solicited material in addition to what was provided; brought in personal ideas and information to enhance project; and utilized more than 8 types of resources to make project effective
|
Did a very good job of
researching; utilized materials provided to their full potential; solicited
more than 6 types of research to enhance project; at times took the initiative
to find information outside of school
|
Used the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not
consult any additional resources
|
Did not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact
gathering on the topic
|
|
Depth &
Breadth of
Project Content
|
Clear
evidence that higher level thinking skills were used in the creation of this
project.
|
Some
evidence that higher level thinking skills were used in the creation of this
project.
|
Little
evidence that higher level thinking skills were used in the creation of this
project.
|
No
evidence that higher level thinking skills were used in the creation of this
project.
|
|
Subject
Knowledge
|
Subject
knowledge is evident throughout the project. All information is clear,
appropriate, and correct.
|
Subject
knowledge is evident in much of the project. Most information is clear,
appropriate, and correct.
|
Some
subject knowledge is evident. Some Information is confusing, incorrect, or
flawed.
|
Subject
knowledge is not evident. Information is confusing, incorrect, or flawed.
|
|
Originality
|
The project shows significant evidence of originality and inventiveness. The majority of the content and many
of the ideas are fresh, original, and inventive.
|
The project shows some evidence of originality and inventiveness. While based on an
extensive collection of other people's ideas, products, images and
inventions, the work extends beyond that collection to offer new insights.
|
The
work is an extensive collection and rehash of other people's ideas, products,
images and inventions. There is little evidence of new thought or
inventiveness.
|
The
work is a minimal collection or rehash of other people's ideas, products,
images and inventions. There is no evidence of new thought.
|
|
Coherence
and
Organization
|
Thesis is clearly stated and developed; specific examples are appropriate and clearly develop thesis; conclusion is clear; shows control; flows together well; good transitions; succinct but not choppy; well organized
|
Most information presented in logical sequence; generally very well
organized but better transitions from idea to idea and medium to medium
needed
|
Concept and ideas are loosely connected; lacks clear
transitions; flow and organization are choppy
|
Presentation is choppy and
disjointed; does not flow; development of thesis is vague; no apparent
logical order of presentation
|
|
- Education Service Center
- Region XI
- 3001 N. Freeway
- Fort Worth, TX 76106

|
|
|
|
|
HOME
Copyright © 2002 Education Service Center Region XI. All right reserved.
|
SITE MAP
|