The rubric below will be used to evaluate the oral presentation. The team can choose their medium (PowerPoint, brochure, video, website) but it must include a report, mathematical model, hypothesis, and calculations used to support their conclusion and proof.
It will assess the following learning goals and objectives:
Team Presentation –
Somewhere Over the Rainbow
PDF
version
www.rubistar.4teachers.org
|
|
4 pts |
3 pts |
2 pts |
1 pt |
Score |
|
|
Content |
Covers topic in-depth with details and examples. Subject knowledge is excellent. |
Includes essential knowledge about the topic. Subject knowledge appears to be good. |
Includes essential information about the topic but there are 1-2 factual errors. |
Content is minimal OR there are several factual errors. |
x 4 |
|
|
Model |
Model is clear and detailed. It greatly adds to understanding of topic. |
Model is clear and easy to understand. |
Model is somewhat difficult to understand. |
Model is difficult to understand or not used. |
x 4 |
|
|
Attractiveness |
Makes excellent use of font, color, graphics, video, effects, etc. to enhance presentation. |
Makes good use of font, color, graphics, video, effects, etc. to enhance presentation. |
Makes use of font, color, graphics, video, effects, etc. but occasionally these detract from presentation content. |
Use of font, color, graphics, video, effects, etc. but these often distract from presentation content. |
x 3 |
|
|
Calculations & Reasoning |
Produces calculations with computer. Uses complex and refined calculations and reasoning to draw conclusion and prove law. |
Produces calculations with computer. Uses effective calculations and reasoning to draw conclusion and prove law. |
Produces calculations with computer, however, does not use calculations or reasoning to draw conclusion and prove law. |
Produces calculations with graphing calculator. Does not use reasoning or calculations to draw conclusion or prove law. |
x 3 |
|
|
Mathematical |
Explanation shows complete understanding of the mathematical concepts used to solve the problem. |
Explanation shows substantial understanding of the mathematical concepts used to solve the problem. |
Explanation shows some understanding of the mathematical concepts needed to solve the problem. |
Explanation shows very limited understanding of the underlying concepts needed to solve the problem OR is not addressed. |
x 3 |
|
|
Individual |
Student was an engaged partner, listening to suggestions of others and working cooperatively throughout project. |
Student was an engaged partner but had trouble listening to others and/or working cooperatively. |
Student cooperated with others, but needed prompting to stay on-task. |
Student did not work effectively with others. |
x 3 |
|
|
Oral |
Interesting, well-rehearsed with smooth delivery that holds audience attention. |
Relatively interesting, rehearsed with a fairly smooth delivery that holds audience attention. |
Delivery not smooth, but able to hold audience attention most of the time. |
Delivery not smooth and audience attention lost. |
x 3 |
|
|
Sources |
Source information collected for all graphics, facts, and quotes. All documented in desired format. |
Source information collected for all graphics, facts, and quotes. Most documented in desired format. |
Source information collected for all graphics, facts, and quotes, but not documented in desired format. |
Very little or no source information was collected. |
x 2 |
|
|
Total Points |
|
|||||