|
|
|
|
What
tasks, strategies, instruments |
How
the processes, how often? |
Why
how
do the selected tools support your learning goals and the
learning principles guiding your design?
|
| a)
to enable continuous/frequent feedback between you and the students |
Discussion
Observation
Ask
probing questions |
Continually |
Provide
constant, specific feedback which will pinpoint trouble spots
and encourage success.
Students
will be responsible for their own learning, but continuous,
specific feedback provides support and encouragement for continued
success. |
Tree chart
Venn diagram
Statement worksheet |
1st half of
class |
| b)
to encourage the students to reflect on their learning progress
and achievement |
Discussion
Partner groupings |
Continually |
Self-monitoring
and partners will build
confidence, encourage collaboration, and promote accountability.
|
| c)
to determine your students' learning progress and achievement |
Observe
progress during class. |
Continually |
Partner teams
promote accountability and collaboration.
Teacher evaluation of final reports gives importance to project
and display of reports celebrates student achievement. |
| Instructor
evaluates each report based on the project
rubric. |
End of class |
| |
| Assessment
Strategies |
| Learning
Goals |
Nested
Objectives |
Type
of Learning |
Assessment
Strategy |
Feedback
Strategy |
Student
Goal
Understand the impact that geography played on the four
ancient river valley civilizations through investigations of
archaeological sites. |
Understand the process and purpose of an archaeological dig.
|
comprehension
application |
Observation
Tree
chart
Venn
diagram
Statement worksheet |
Verbal
Written
Written
Written |
|
Compare and
contrast information gathered on the four ancient river valley
civilizations. |
comprehension
application
analysis
synthesis
|
Student
Goal
Predict what an archaeological dig of Carroll High School 5000
years from now might lead future archaeologists to conclude
about our civilization. |
Make
predictions about modern day society based on historical
information. |
comprehension
application
analysis
synthesis
|
Observation
Teacher rubric evaluation
|
Verbal
Rubric
|
|
Understand
how current day geography, architecture, tools, and technology
available in 2004 impact our civilization at Carroll High
School. |
comprehension
application
analysis
synthesis
evaluation
|
Teacher
Goal
Develop confidence in creating and implementing technology
integrated lesson plans. |
Adequately
prepare for successful implementation of the lesson plan. |
affective
application
analysis
|
Discussion
Collaboration
Reflection
Observation
|
Verbal
|
|
Reflect on
the lesson implementation and focus on the positive outcomes. |
affective
analysis
|
Teacher
Goal
Use instructional strategies that support diverse learners and
address classroom management strategies. |
Understand
various instructional strategies and how they relate to specific
disabilities. |
|
Planning observation and discussion
|
Verbal |
| Conference
to receive Spec Ed input for students requiring modifications
(gifted, impaired, special needs) |
comprehension
application |
| Secure
equipment, lab, and library reservation and checkout in a timely
manner, as well as effectively managing team rotation on classroom
computers. |
knowledge
application |
Mentor
Goal
Help teacher to develop confidence in troubleshooting
technology issues that occur during student lessons. |
Plan
and carry out pre- and post- technical skills sessions so that
teacher gains confidence in her abilities. |
affective
comprehension
application
analysis |
Self-evaluation
Cognitive
coaching sessions
Teacher
feedback
|
Metacognition
Verbal, written
Verbal
|
|
If necessary during the lesson, direct teacher in how to solve
technical issue, but let her carry the steps out to completion. |
affective
application
analysis |
Mentor
Goal
Use questioning strategies to guide teacher in creating
learner-centered lessons that maximize positive impact on
students. |
Explain
the research-based connection between technology integration
and instructional design. |
|
Self-evaluation
Cognitive
coaching sessions
Teacher
feedback
Partner rubric scores
|
Metacognition
Verbal,
written
Verbal
Written |
|
Continued
heightened awareness during mentoring sessions of telling
instead of questioning, and listening instead of
speaking. |
comprehension
application
synthesis |
|
Can You Dig It? |
|
Objectives |
Laborer |
Student |
Head Assistant |
Professor of Archaeology |
Earned Points |
|
Written from the perspective of an archaeologist.
|
5 points
No attempt is made to write report from the perspective of an
archaeologist. |
10 points
Some of the report is written from the perspective of an
archaeologist. Has lapses in some areas. |
15 points
Most of the report is written from the perspective of an
archaeologist. Has lapses in some areas. |
20 points
All of the report is written from the perspective of an
archaeologist. |
|
|
Relates evidence gathered during virtual tours of authentic
archeological digs to predictions made about CHS dig.
|
8 points
Does not relate evidence from authentic digs. |
16 points
Includes evidence from authentic digs, but is not successful
synthesizing into predictions made about CHS dig. |
24 points
Includes evidence from authentic digs and attempts to synthesize
it into predictions made about CHS dig, but doesn't quite make
the connection. |
32 points
Successfully synthesizes evidence from authentic digs into
predictions made about CHS dig. |
|
|
Use creative, critical thinking to make predictions based on the
geography, architecture, tools, and technology of the authentic
digs. |
7 points
Includes predictions using one element. |
14 points
Includes predictions using two elements. |
21 points
Includes predictions using three elements. |
28 points
Includes predictions using all four elements. |
|
|
Mechanics and Conventions
|
5 points
Incomprehensible because of many spelling, grammar, and
punctuation errors. |
10 points
Comprehensible, but still includes many spelling, grammar, and
punctuation errors. |
15 points
Readable with few spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors. |
20 points
Easily readable with no spelling, grammar, and punctuation
errors. |
|