Cindy
Brock |
Home | ||||
| Assessment Instruments | |||||
| Objectives | What task, strategies, instruments |
How the processes, how often |
Why How do the selected tools support the learning goals and the learning |
||
| 1.) To enable continuous/frequent feedback between you and the students | Observation Ask questions Dialog |
Continually | Provides the teacher with constant data and feedback on the student progress that will allow modifications and clarifications. | ||
| 2.) To encourage the student to reflect on their learning progress and achievement. | Dialog Probing Questions Rubric |
Talk to students. clarify questions Dialog Students will refer to rubric for additional clarification |
Provides the students with a source for guidance when questions arise. Provides the students with a guide of what is expected and what needs to be done. |
||
| 3.) To determine your students' learning progress and achievement. | Observation Dialog Checklists Rubric |
Observe student progress daily Ask students clarifying questions daily Evaluate work based on rubric
|
provides the teacher with a way of determining student progress Opens discussions between teacher and student Provides teacher with a way to guide and evaluate student work |
||
| Assessment Strategies | |||||
| Goals | Sub-Goals | Type of Learning | Assessment Strategy | Feedback Strategy | |
Student Goal Understand the impact of family marriages, deaths, and births through interviews and internet research on the students’ own life. |
The student inquires and conducts research using a variety of sources | Cognitive, (analysis, synthesis) Cognitive ( comprehension, application) |
Observation Notes Checklists Rubric criteria |
discussion written checklist |
|
| The student listens critically to analyze and evaluate a speaker's message | Cognitive, (analysis, synthesis) Cognitive ( comprehension, application) |
Observation Notes Checklists Rubric criteria |
discussion written checklists |
||
| Reflect on the choices and decisions made by family members and how those affect the present and futures. | Cognitive, (analysis, synthesis) Cognitive ( comprehension, application) |
Observation Notes Checklists Rubric criteria |
discussion written checklist |
||
| Student Goal Students will synthesize their finding for a formal presentation. |
The student speaks clearly and appropriately to different
audiences for different purposes and occasions |
Cognitive, (synthesis, evaluation) | Observation Rubric criteria |
Discussion Grading rubric |
|
| The student listens and speaks to gain and share knowledge of his/her own culture, the culture of others, and the common elements of cultures. | Cognitive, (synthesis, evaluation) | Observation Rubric criteria |
Discussion Grading rubric |
||
| The student will create an electronic document on the finding of their research. | Cognitive, (synthesis, evaluation) | Rubric criteria | Written Discussion |
||
| Goals | Sub-Goals | Type of Learning | Assessment Strategy | Feedback Strategy | |
| Teacher Goal Access a variety of resources and apply new technology to instruction |
Learn how to focus internet research and model for the students. |
Cognitive (application, analysis) Cognitive (knowledge) |
Observation Questioning Discussion |
Discussion Written |
|
| Learn how to cite sources and teach to the students. | Cognitive (application, analysis) Cognitive (knowledge) |
Observation Questioning Discussion |
Discussion Written |
||
| Learn to trouble shoot technical problems | Cognitive (application, analysis) Cognitive (knowledge) |
Observation Questioning Discussion |
Discussion Written |
||
| Teacher Goal The teacher will increase her level of technology integration and classroom management strategies into the curriculum in addition to addressing the needs of diverse learners. |
Thoroughly prepare for the implementation of the lesson. |
Cognitive (application, analysis) | Observation Application Self-evaluation |
Discussion Written |
|
| Research/choose the best technology for the lesson | Cognitive (knowledge)
Comprehension Application |
Self-evaluation |
Discussion | ||
| Reflect on the lesson and what was successful and what could be done better the next time. | Cognitive, (synthesis, evaluation) | Self-evaluation | Discussion | ||
| Goals | Sub-Goals | Type of Learning | Assessment Strategy | Feedback Strategy | |
| Professional Goals Facilitate the comfort level of the teacher in using technology to enhance lessons in order to impact student learning in a positive manner |
Build and maintain a trusting relationship with mentee |
Effective Communication Collaboration & cooperation |
Comprehension application Analysis |
Self-evaluation Cognitive |
|
| Guide the teacher in how to troubleshoot technical problems that may arise during the lesson. | Effective Communication Collaboration & cooperation |
Comprehension application Analysis |
Self-evaluation Cognitive |
||
| Rubric | |||||
The rubric below will be used to assess the students formal presentation, family tree, and writing process of doing research on their family origins. Learning Goals:
Learning Objectives:
|
|||||
| Rubric made using RubiStar: http://rubistar.4teachers.org/index.php | |||||
| Family Tree and Formal Presentation Rubric | |||||
| Catergory | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Family tree chart draft | Student will have filled out a family tree chart.Tracing back to the great- grandparent's generation. All relatives have first, last and maiden names of all male and female relatives, year of births, year of deaths, and place of birth for each person in family tree. | Student has most of the family tree filled out to great grandparents. Some information is missing. | Student has some of the family tree filled out to grand parents, and information is missing. | Student did not complete family tree beyond grandparents. Or no chart was created. | Student has no draft chart |
| Family interviews for essay draft | Student completed interview questions for all of the living relatives in the family tree. | Student has most of the interview questions of living relatives completed. | Student has few interview questions completed. | Student has not complete interview questions. | Student has no draft essay |
| Origin of Surname (Last name) | Student has listed the origins and information about his or her surname and all surnames of other family members in family tree. | Student has listed the origin and information about his/her father's last and mother's maiden names, and some of the grandparents surnames. | Student has listed the origin and information about only his/her father's and mother's maiden names. | Student has only father's surname information or has not complete origins of surnames | Has nothing. |
| Family essay Final Version | Student will have written a 4 paragraph essay. 1st paragraph about the history and origin his/her Surname, 2nd paragraph about the history of father's side of family, 3rd paragraph about the history of mother's side of family and 4th paragraph about student's family today. | Student uses several sentences in each paragraph, showing use of interview questions, student only has 3 paragraphs. | Students use of interview questions were not clear. Few sentences were used. Only has 2 paragraphs. | Student has not completed family essay. Use of interview questions in not clear, difficult to read or understand. | No final essay |
| Family Tree Final Version | Student has complete family tree with all information. Chart is printed/written neatly, with no mistakes or corrections. | Students has most of the family tree completed with all information. Chart is somewhat easy to read. | Student has some of the family tree complete, some information is missing. Chart is readable and fairly easy to follow. | Student has several people, information missing and/or not complete. Chart is messy and not easy to read or understand. | No Famil Tree Chart |
| On Task | Used class time well, focused on getting project completed and never distracted others. Followed Class rules and behavior is excellent. | Used class time well during the project, usually focused on completing project and never distracted others. Followed class rules and well behaved. | Used some of the class time well during project. There was some focus on completing project, but occasionally distracted others. Had to be reminded about class rules and behavior. | Did not use class time well during project, or was off task by often distracting others. Had to be reminded several times about behavior and class rules. | |
| Presentation: | Student has a choice to present final project to class, or turned in as a final packet. Final project is easy to read and understand. Turned in by due date. | Final project is somewhat complete, few items missing or incomplete. Project is somewhat easy to read and understand. Turned in by due date. | Final project has some pieces missing or incomplete. Final project is sometime confusing to read and understand. Turned in late | Final project is missing pieces. Not complete, and is not easy to read or understand. Turned well past due date/or not turned in at all. | No project submitted. |