Farmer: Assessment
| Assessment Instruments | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plan To: |
What (tasks, strategies, instruments) |
How (the processes, how often) |
Why (how the selected tools support learning goals/principles guiding design) |
||
| Enable continuous/frequent feedback between you and the participants. |
|
|
|
||
| Encourage the participants to reflect on their learning progress and achievement. |
|
|
|
||
| Determine the participant's learning progress and achievement. |
|
|
|
||
Goals |
Sub-Goals (Objectives) |
Type of Learning |
Assessment Strategy |
Feedback Strategy | |
| 1. Understand the purpose of the Kurweil Educational System and various instructional implications of its use | 1. Participants access demo website 2. Participants understand instructional implication of issues related to struggling readers |
Cognitive - Analysis, synthesis, evaluation |
Discussion Reflection Observation |
1. Instructor directed questioning to encourage discussion |
|
| 2. Learn to open and use Kurzweil to read text from a variety of sources. |
1. Explore options from menu bar and tool bars
2. Open and read text from saved documents and from Internet web pages |
Cognitive – knowledge, comprehension, synthesis | Performance Discussion Reflection Observation |
1. Successful use of software 2. Instructor directed questioning to encourage discussion 3. Response from participants during training and after time for reflection 4. Instructor observation of participant success or difficulty |
|
3. Learn to change a variety of settings to individualize the program for specific students |
1. Adjust settings for: reading speed, reading mode, reading unit, language
2. Experience how adjusted settings affect user experience of text which is read |
Cognitive – knowledge, comprehension, evaluation | Performance Discussion Reflection Observation |
1. Successful use of software 2. Instructor directed questioning to encourage discussion 3. Response from participants during training and after time for reflection 4. Instructor observation of participant success or difficulty |
|
| 4. Learn to use electronic notes within the Kurzweil program to communicate with students. | 1. Create sticky notes and footnotes
2. Use notes to: give directions/feedback, ask question and get response from student 3. Use read feature to read notes |
Cognitive – knowledge, comprehension, evaluation
|
Performance Discussion Reflection Observation Product |
1. Successful use of software 2. Instructor directed questioning to encourage discussion 3. Response from participants during training and after time for reflection 4. Instructor observation of participant success or difficulty 5. Successful creation and use of notes |
|
| 5. Understand how students will access and utilize the Kurzweil system. | 1.Logon to network and open Kurzweil
2. Discuss implications of need for unique logins for students rather than generic student logins 3. Discuss methods of enhancing student access such as by using adaptor to "split" headphone signal so that 2 headphones connect to a single computer |
Cognitive – knowledge, comprehension, synthesis, evaluation | Discussion |
1. Instructor directed questioning to encourage discussion 2. Response from participants during training and after time for reflection |
|
| 6. Develop effective training materials. | 1. Use step sheet during training
2. Provide feedback to guide development of additional training materials |
Cognitive - Analysis, synthesis, evaluation |
Performance Discussion Reflection Observation Product |
1. Successful development of step sheet |
|
| 7. Learn to utilize Kurzweil effectively to be able to address participate questions and concerns. | 1. Ask related questions during training to solicit participant questions and concerns 2. Identify features which will be useful for students learning their subject area TEKS |
Cognitive - Analysis, synthesis, evaluation |
Performance Reflection Product |
1. Successful exploration and use of software 2. Reflection after each training opportunity to self-evaluate 3. Completed training for staff |
|
| Professional Goals: 8. Utilize effective staff development strategies which address the needs of adult learners. |
1. Build technology skills while learning software features to meet a variety of needs of students with reading disabilities | Cognitive - Analysis, synthesis, evaluation |
Performance |
1. Successful staff development based on participant feedback 2. Reflection after each staff development opportunity to self-evaluate 3. Instructor observation of participant success or difficulties during training opportunities 4. Completion of staff development |
|
| 9. Utilize effective coaching and mentoring skills. | 1. Communicate with MTTC coach to provide information to facilitate mentoring activities 2. Value the mentoring process and incorporate strategies in my daily professional duties. 3. Develop mentoring/coaching skills in order to better assist teachers on my campus |
Cognitive - Analysis, synthesis, evaluation |
Performance Discussion Reflection Observation Product |
1. Feedback provided by MTTC coach 2. Discussion with MTTC coach after reflection/self-evaluation regarding ways to improve on personal performance 3. Completion of MTTC mentoring web site. |
|
Participants and Instructor will meet the following learning goals and objectives: Standard I: All teachers use technology -related terms, concepts, data input strategies, and ethical practices to make informed decisions about current technologies and their applications. Rubrics (Participant and Instructor) |
|||||
| Use the participant rubric below to evaluate your own performance as a participant in this technology staff development opportunity. This reflection on your role in the training process is designed to facilitate personal growth as a professional and clarify areas for future improvement and/or staff development. (Also complete the instructor rubric which follows.) | |||||
| CATEGORY | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | Self-Evaluation Insights/Needs |
| Attitude | Never publicly critical of the project or the work of others. Always have a positive attitude about the task(s). | Rarely publicly critical of the project or the work of others. Often have a positive attitude about the task(s). | Occasionally publicly critical of the project or the work of other members of the group. Usually have a positive attitude about the task(s). | Often publicly critical of the project or the work of other members of the group. Often have a negative attitude about the task(s). | |
| Working with Others | Almost always listen to, share with, and support the efforts of others. Try to keep people working well together. | Usually listen to, share, with, and support the efforts of others. Do not cause "waves" in the group. | Often listen to, share with, and support the efforts of others, but sometimes not a good team member. | Rarely listen to, share with, and support the efforts of others. Often not a good team player. | |
| Contributions | Routinely provide useful ideas when participating in the group and in training discussion. I am a definite leader who contributes a lot of effort. | Usually provide useful ideas when participating in the group and in training discussion. I am a strong group member who tries hard! | Sometimes provide useful ideas when participating in the group and in training discussion. I am a satisfactory group member who does what is required. | Rarely provide useful ideas when participating in the group and in training discussion. I may refuse to participate. | |
| Focus on the task | Consistently stay focused on the task and what needs to be done. Very self-directed. | Focus on the task and what needs to be done most of the time. Other group members can count on me. | Focus on the task and what needs to be done some of the time. Other group members must sometimes nag, prod, and remind me to keep on-task. | Rarely focus on the task and what needs to be done. I prefer to let others do the work. | |
| Problem-solving | Actively look for and suggests solutions to problems. | Refine solutions suggested by others. | Do not suggest or refine solutions, but am willing to try out solutions suggested by others. | Do not try to solve problems or help others solve problems. Prefer to let others do the work. | |
| Technical Skills | I have all the technical skills I need to implement the use of the material provided during training. | I have most of the technical skills I need to implement the use of the material provided during training. I am confident that I can get additional support when needed. | I have some of the technical skills I need but will need additional support before attempting to implement the use of material provided. | I have few of the technical skills I need and will need additional training prior to attempting implementation of the material provided. | |
| Use the rubric below to evaluate my performance as the instructor in this technology staff development opportunity. This reflection on my role in the training process is designed to facilitate my personal growth as a professional and clarify areas for future improvement and/or staff development. | |||||
| CATEGORY | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement | Insights/Suggestion for Instructor |
| Training Time | Training offered at very convenient time and utilized instructional time effectively at all times. | Training offered at convenient time and utilized instructional time effectively. | Training offered at acceptable time and utilized instructional time effectively most of the time. | Training offered at time difficult to attend and/or utilized instructional time effectively only some of the time. | |
| Training Materials | Training materials were well organized, through, and addressed needs of participants during training and for reference after training. | Training materials were well organized, through, and addressed most needs of participants during training and for reference after training. | Training materials were somewhat organized, through, and addressed many needs of participants during training and/or for reference after training. | Training materials were somewhat organized and addressed some needs of participants during training and/or for reference after training. | |
| Training Content | All issues required for successful implementation were effectively addressed. | Most issues required for successful implementation were effectively addressed. | Some issues required for successful implementation were effectively addressed. | Few issues required for successful implementation were effectively addressed. | |
| Presentation | Presentation skills were highly engaging, extremely clear, and enhanced the content of the training. | Presentation skills were engaging, clear, and appropriate to the content of the training. | Presentation skills were appropriate to the content of the training. | Presentation skills detracted from the content of the training. | |
| Communication | Instructor communicated effectively during all phases of instruction | Instructor communicated effectively during most phases of instruction | Instructor communicated effectively during some phases of instruction; some areas were not effectively addressed | Communication skills need improvement to facilitate effective training experience. | |
| Ongoing Support | I feel confident that additional support or training will be available when it is needed | I feel somewhat confident that additional support or training will be available when it is needed | I feel that additional support or training will be available, but may not be what or when it is needed | I feel that additional support or training will not be available when it is needed | |
Overall Evaluation of Training |
|||||
Comments: Please add any information you feel would be helpful for improving this training. Also indicate any additional training needs you may have related to this topic or any other topic of interest to you.
|
|||||
| Back To Top | |||||