MTTC Mentoring Field Experience Home Page
MTTC Mentoring Field Experience Home Page
Master Tech Teacher

MASTER TECHNOLOGY TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

Education Service Center
Region XI

Giving them the tools that will stay with them for a life time

Leah Franco


Assessment Instruments

What

tasks, strategies, instruments

How

the processes, how often?

Why

how do the selected tools support your learning goals and the learning principles guiding your design?

a) to enable continuous/frequent feedback between you and the students Discussions, Questions/Inquiry

 

 




Print out of charts and graphs; comparison of figures.

Daily throughout the guided practice to insure that problems with experiment/software/projection equipment function correctly.

 



Daily continuous guided practice and specific questions to insure students know what data to use.

At the end, comparison of papers for data samples.

Discussions and guided practice will build confidence in the experiment process. As questions/problems arise, teacher will solve problems (troubleshoot)/answer questions. 

Comparison of data will build confidence in the use of the technology.

b) to encourage the students to reflect on their learning progress and achievement Daily discussions, daily self-assessment, teacher assessment of student's performance during experiment, end of experiment essay (compare/contrast) formal assessment (rubric) at end of experiment, graded exercise (computations) Check points will be daily. Teacher will assess each student's participation/knowledge of experiment as student is conducting experiment. 

Students will compare data print out as soon as experiment is completed. Teacher will check to insure precise figures.

 

 

 

 

Reflective paper will illustrate the different in manual versus electronic collection and manipulation of data.

Rubrics at end will assist teacher in grading students' knowledge of experiment process. 

Graded exercise (calculations) will illustrate that students can find correct data sets and derive correct figures as outlined in lesson. 

Group assistance with use of the experiment peripherals will assist those students who are not as technology savvy as others. However, will keep all involved in the process. Check points will insure that students are going in the right direction.

Collaborative efforts on part of students will insure that more students understand process and collection of data/check preciseness of data.

Reflective paper will assist students in thinking through the experiment and collection of data.

c) to determine your students' learning progress and achievement Formal assessment--Rubric to monitor/check students actions as they conduct experiment.


 

Formal assessment--Let students compare answers to insure the correct collection of data (specific points). 

Monitor students as they use set of data to solve equations.



Continually through the experiment.


Continually while students are collecting and manipulating the data (software).

 

After completion of visual collection of data. 

 

 

Continually as students complete calculations.

Rubric (checklist) will assess how well the students learned to conduct the experiment and collect the correct data. It will guide the teacher in determining who might need tutorials before the use of the experiment process again.

Insures that everyone has the correct data to start calculation process. Builds confidence in students' ability to collect data.

Objective is for students to compute (1) conservation of momentum, (2) measure energy changes, and (3) classify type of collision. These calculations are used to determine the above criteria.

 

Assessment Strategies

Goals Sub-Goals (Objectives) Type of Learning Assessment Strategy Feedback Strategy
Student Goals:
Set-up computer for experiment.

1. Demonstrate use of peripherals and software for experiment (provide instructions).

2. Conduct a mock experiment to test equipment.

3. Illustrate to students what graph should look like if materials are interacting correctly.

1. Comprehension

 

 


2. Comprehension

 

3. Application

Observe students as they begin to set-up experiment.

 

 


Observation of students as they conduct experiment. 



Observation of student's data.

How will you know if equipment is set-up correctly? How will you know if computer/software is operating?

How do you know that experiment equipment is working? 

What should graph look like? (prior knowledge) What does this graph look like? Is this graph correct? 

Conduct collision experiments to collect sets of data. 1. Watch and instruct as students run experiment.


2. Watch, instruct, and explain as students watch data collection.

3. Check data and graph to insure software is working correctly.

1. Application

 



2. Analysis

 



3. Analysis

Observation/Rubrics check off (follow rubrics to see if and how much guidance student required).


Observation/Rubrics check off (collection of data portion). 



Observation/Rubrics check off (collection of data portion). Check print out of data....graph and chart. Comparison of papers to insure correct data.

Is experiment going as planned? Are data sets being collected? Is there a chart and graph to eventually print?
How do obtain specific points to use for your calculations? 


Is this the correct data for your calculations? Which data will you use for each formula? Where do you find the correct data points?

Create and print a chart that shows exact points to be used for calculations.

 

1. Question students about specific points needed.

 

 

2. Illustrate to students how to manipulate software to get points.

3. Illustrate how to print information for use in calculations

1. Synthesis

 


 

2. Synthesis

 

 

3. Application

Teacher check of materials gathered by students.  

 



Observation of teacher....check print outs.

 


Check Print Out

Verbal answers: Is this the correct data for your calculations? Which data will you use for each formula? Where do you find the correct data points?
Do you need more points? What specific points do you need for your calculations?

What type of data will you need? What figures from print out will you use? 

Calculations to determine set values 1. Illustrate putting data into formulas. Values such as (1) conservation of momentum, (2) energy changes, and (3) classification of collision are to be determined. 1. Synthesis and Evaluation Students will compare answers (figures). Teacher will check answers against key and check answers of 3 prescribed questions. Rubric will assess students' successes. What values are we trying to derive? How much momentum is conserved? How has energy changed throughout the experiment? According to your calculations, what type of collision has taken place?
Reflection 1. Students will write paper to compare use of technology vs. manual collection of data. 1. Synthesis and Evaluation Teacher will check content of paper for coverage of technology comparison points.  What is the difference between the 2 types of data collection methods? Which is the more accurate? Which is the easiest to use? 
Teacher/Mentor Goals:

Create a lesson that combines technology and science.

 


1. Utilize technological peripherals to conduct experiment.

2. Utilize software to collect experiment data and project graphs/charts to be used by students.

 


1. Application 

 

 

2. Application

 


Document conference with teacher about materials to be used. Note specific problem areas that need explanation/assistance.
Have a run through session that explores all points/activities that the teacher wants to cover. Collected data will also give teacher an idea of what to expect from experiment (guideline for students)

 


What assistance do you need with peripherals? What assistance do you need with computer? 
Where do you feel problems will arise with computer? peripherals? software? graph? data manipulation? chart? print out? students' calculations?

Maintain a working relationship between mentor and teacher. 1. Establish goals.

 

2. Demonstrate uses of software.



 

 

3. Guide teacher in using software and finding desired results.

1. Comprehension and Application.

2. Comprehension and Application.


 

 

3. Application and Analysis

Mental check-off of  teacher's progress with use of technology...computer, software, printer.

Mental check-off of teacher's security/independence as more data samples are collected. 

 

 

 

Comparison of teacher's key with our results...

Have we determined the correct usage of peripheral? Do you know how to use computer? Do you know how to use software? Do you know how to collect data samples? Do you know how to manipulate data? Do you know how to print data?


Do we have the correct figures? Do we have the correct graph? Can the student's determine the 3 important values from the data provided?

Evaluate lesson and conditions and modifications to assist gifted and learning disabled. 1. Establish teacher's concerns and modifications in this area.

 


2. Demonstrate finding specific information for gifted.

 

 

3. Demonstrate use of software and projector for learning disabled.

1. Knowledge and Analysis

 

 

 

2. Application and Analysis

 

 

 

3. Analysis and Synthesis

Check teacher's learning disabled student list and gifted student list to identify the problems/concerns.

 



Check teacher's objectives for gifted students. Assist with aiding these students.

 

 


Demonstrate the use of the projector for learning disabled student. Check that teacher knows how to plug-in and use. Check that she also knows how to magnify material. 

Who are the learning disabled? What types of assistance do they need? 

 


What type of exercises will you have for your gifted students? How will their materials be "extended"?



Do you know how to magnify material? 


Mentor's Goals:

Direct a coworker to utilize hardware and software necessary to conduct an experiment using charting/graphing software.



1. Complete entire experiment procedure.



2. Clarify software areas that are "troublesome". 

 

3. Troubleshoot all peripherals, hardware, and software.

4. Develop an assessment instrument.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Differentiate the needs of learners at various cognitive levels.

 

1. Application




2. Application

 

 


3. Application

 



4. Synthesis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5. Evaluation



Provide guided instruction on entire experiment procedure including set-up of all peripherals and computer parts.


As experiment is conducted, make a list of problems encountered and "tip" sheet to assist teacher during class time.


As experiment is conducted, make a list of problems encountered and "tip" sheet to assist teacher during class time.

Develop a check list of goals/objectives of lesson and create rubrics from these. Develop a checklist to "grade" the experiment process.

 

 

 

 

 


While considering modifications sheets, assist the teacher in developing goals/objectives/modifications for gifted learners and learning disabled students.

 

 

Do you know how to use computer (turn on, project screen, load software?)


In the past, what part of the software has not operated correctly? What questions do you have about graphing/chart?

 

 


What do you expect your students to learn from the experiment process? What part of the experiment process do you expect your students to be able to do? What type of values do you expect your students to derive? What type of content do you want their paper to contain?


What is expected of the learning disabled student? What is expected/projected for the gifted learner? What is expected for the overall student?

 

Rubric

The rubric below will be used by the teacher to assess the student's activities such as the following: running of the experiment, collection of data, printing of data, and use of data in formulas for the Collision experiment. Lastly, it will also assess the students reflection of the experiment process.

Learning Goals:

  1. Use the lap top computer and technology peripherals to conduct a collision experiment.
  2. Use the data points collected to determine (1) conservation of momentum, (2) energy changes, and (3) classifications of collisions.
  3. Reflect on the procedure and compare/contrast a manual collection of data versus a computerized collection of data.

Learning Objectives:

1a. Guided practice on how to run experiment.
1b. Determine validity of data sets (is experiment working correctly?)
1c. Print data graph/chart.

2a. Utilize data points to determine conservation of momentum.
2b. Utilize data points to determine energy changes.
2c. Utilize data points to determine classifications of collisions.

3a. Write a paper describing the uses of technological devices in experiment.
3b. Write a paper describing the use of computers to graph and determine points.

CRITERIA Excellent
(10 points)
Good
(8 points)
Satisfactory
(6 points)
Needs Improvement
(4 points)
Score Received
Experiment:

Set-up of peripherals.

Set-up portion of experiment with little assistance (2 times)  Set-up portion of experiment with little assistance (3 times)  Set-up portion of experiment with little assistance (4 times)  Could not complete task at all without supervision.  
Conducting experiment. Did assigned job (after guided practice) with little (2 times) assistance.  Did assigned job (after guided practice) with little (3 times) assistance.  Did assigned job (after guided practice) with little (4 times) assistance.  Could not complete task at all without supervision.  
Manipulated Data Illustrate ability to determine specific points in software.(1st time) Illustrate ability to determine specific points in software.(with assistance) Illustrate ability to determine specific points in software.(majority of teacher guidance) Could not complete task at all without supervision.  
Printed Data Printed data with no assistance. Printed data with little (1 clue) assistance. Printed data with some (2-3 clues) assistance. Could not complete task at all without supervision.  
Calculations Determined values using data sets. Determined values using data sets with teacher assistance (2 clues) Determined values using data sets with teacher assistance (3 clues). Could not complete task at all without supervision.  
Reflection Paper: 

Content

Adequately covered use of technological peripherals and collection of data (compare/contrast at least 6 points). Covered use of technological peripherals and collection of data (compare/contrast at least 4 points). Covered use of technological peripherals and collection of data (compare/contrast at least 3 points). No mention of either the use of technological peripherals and/or collection of data.  
           
Date Created: 2003-02-26
rubistar.4teachers.org

Copyright. © 2002, 2001, 2000, 1999, 1998, 1997 ALTec, the University of Kansas

 

Education Service Center
Region XI
3001 N. Freeway
Fort Worth, TX 76106

ESC 11

HOME
Copyright © 2002 Education Service Center Region XI. All right reserved.
SITE MAP