|
SBEC Standard #3
|
Task Appropriate Tools in Problem-Solving
|
| Use task-appropriate tools
to synthesize knowledge, create and modify solutions,
and evaluate results in a way that supports the work
of individuals and groups in problem-solving situations. |
| |
Reflection:
|
Sometimes the appropriate tools
are the same as the tools that you have on hand. Not
always, but sometimes. If this is the case and the intended
audience does not map to the tools that you have, what
are your options? Can you print the digital graphic successfully
to fulfill the need? Do you really need a web page for
giving students instructions on how to get to the bathroom
from their 3rd row seat in History? What is a better
way?
What is a better way? This is the primary question
that all I have to teach to the students. There are 1000
ways to do most technology tasks, but the correct
one depends on having experience with
fundamental concepts of design, analysis, and tools.
As a TATC graduate, I will always strive to reward
improvisation between the lines and listen to reasons
(even change the lesson plan, for good ones) why the
lines are in the wrong place. |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Caption 6
|
Indicators:
|
8.7s, 8.11s, 8.13s,
8.14s, 8.15s, 8.16s, 8.21s, 8.25s, 8.32s, 8.34s, 8.35s,
8.37s, 8.44s, 8.45s, 9.7s, 9.8s, 9.11s, 9.12s, 9.13s,
9.15s, 9.16s, 9.21s, 9.27s, 9.28s, 9.31s, 9.33s, 9.35s,
9.39s, 9.40s, 9.41s, 10.3s, 10.4s, 10.7s, 10.9s, 10.14s,
10.16s, 10.17s, 10.18s, 10.22s, 10.24s, 10.25s, 10.26s,
10.28s, 10.29s, 10.30s, 10.32s, 10.36s, 10.40s, 10.41s,
10.43s, 11.2s, 11.4s, 11.7s, 11.10s, 11.11s, 11.12s,
11.19s, 11.21s, 11.24s, 11.25s, 11.26s, 11.29s, 11.31s,
11.35s, |
| |
|
| Artifact
#6 |
Group Mood Video |
| |
Descriptors:
|
Video Editing, Web Page Development,
Integrated Sound and Video |
| |
|
Title:
|
Mood Video (Group Project) |
| |
|
Course:
|
TATC 105-1: Video Technology
Week 1 - Mood |
| |
|
Date Created:
|
03/25/2003 |
| |
|
Source:
|
Consolidated audio files and
video files from Internet downloads. Provided by group
members: Steve Smiley, Beverly Sweeney, and Carol Luttmer |
| |
|
Media:
|
Web delivery of Microsoft Streaming
Server (V9) and HTML |
| |
|
Description:
|
The assignment:
Establish a basic mood--tranquility, anxiety, reverence, anger, patriotism,
sensuality, spirituality, or whatever--entirely through your
selection and composition of clips.
Your "Mood" piece video requirements
- A time limit of 1 min.
- A storyboard or script of the video - You may use either
the storyboard or script format but as a group you will need
to decide which format before beginning.
- A mood conveyed
- At least 3 edited/cut/trimmed scenes from their original
clip
- Sound
- Credits
|
| |
|
Rationale:
|
The group decided on a "Patriotic" theme.
Everyone's first idea was to choose patriotic music;
however, this was prohibited by the instructions.
To accomplish our mood, we combined imagery of 9/11 and American symbols,
such as the flag, Statue of Liberty, and eagle to evoke the mood. The
music was chosen because its rise and fall in pitch and tone reflected
the timing of the images within the video.
Our primary emphasis was on the continuity of the video. We used dissolves
throughout, primarily because each of our clips contained multiple scenes
transitioned with dissolves. Also, "dissolve" matched the slow-motion
quality of the soundtrack.
This video was our first experience
with manual encoding and embedding encoded videos into
web pages. The process was educational and painful, which
most good educational experiences are. As usual, Microsoft's
methods for preparing online content are not the easiest
or simplest to follow, but the video does appear to work
IF you have the latest version of every possible piece
of software involved. RealMedia has a better handle on
the creation and delivery of streaming media.
I learned a great deal during the video editing
process; the use of sound and how to coordinate
that manually with the video was an excellent
exercise.
Work Plan:
Roles:
Producer: Smiley
Storyboard: Sweeney
Sound Editor: Luttmer
Plan:
Deliver to me via email by Sunday morning
a video clip, truncated to 20 seconds or less.
Beverly will create a storyboard, due Monday morning
Carol will find a sound "track" for use within the video, due Monday
morning
Once I have the video clips, I'll rough them together and put it
up for your review.
With the finished storyboard, (Monday) I will add a title and credits
within the video as well as the sound track.
I will also create a web page to house our creation and contain any
comments that we will want to make.
Workflow:
sunday morning: find and send clips
(email)
Sunday evening 9PM: review rough video (web page - ugly)
Monday morning: Send storyboard and sound (email)
Monday evening: Review preliminary video (web page - cleaner)
Tuesday morning: Review final video (email)
Tuesday evening: review notes and post final pages (finished)
Wednesday evening: laze around and read other people's stuff.
|
| |
|
Implications for Future:
|
I learned a great deal about
video manipulation during this task....I needed the practice
with MGI Videowave and this assignment provided it. |
| |
|
Reviewers Comments:
|
You guys did a great video
on PRIDE and PATRIOTISM. A good choice for our times,
in my opinion. The rotating eagle and Statue of Liberty
laser show were awesome, and the music fit the video
well. Your web page was well-designed and colors complemented
your mood of patriotism. Excellent job!
|
Reviewer Name:
|
Kathleen Markwardt |
Date Reviewed:
|
03/26/2003 |
Reviewers Title:
|
TATC Student |
| Top
of Page |
|
| |
Caption 16
|
Indicators:
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 8.1s, 8.7s, 8.9s,
8.10s, 8.11s, 8.13s, 8.14s, 8.24s, 8.25s, 8.33s, 8.34s, 8.35s,
8.38s, 8.39s, 8.40s, 11.1s, 11.2s, 11.4s, 11.7s, 11.10s,
11.11s, 11.12s, 11.14s, 11.23s, 11.24s, 11.25s, 11.26s, 11.27s,
11.29s, 11.30s, 11.32s, 11.34s, 11.35s |
| |
|
| Artifact
#16 |
Input Devices |
| |
Descriptors:
|
Webmastering, Development,
Tools, Evaluation |
| |
|
Title:
|
Input Devices |
| |
|
Course:
|
TATC 201-1: Extended Digital
Graphics Week |
| |
|
Date Created:
|
11/18/2002 |
| |
|
Source:
|
Analysis and development was
all done from scratch; images taken from product/company
web sites. |
| |
|
Media:
|
Web delivery |
| |
|
Description:
|
The assignment:
Research two input devices and compare and contrast the
devices. One of the input devices you research must be
an assistive device. Input devices are used in many different
ways in each project that you do. You can use a scanner,
camera, drawing tablet, etc.
Tell us by using some of the factors below what you
would consider when making a choice as to what type
of input device to use.
- Tell the Input Device you
researched.
- Give us a Brief Description.
- List it's Advantages and
Disadvantages.
- Briefly tell its quality, appropriateness, effectiveness,
and efficiency.
- What should be your concerns
when purchasing an input device?
Tell if there is
ever a time when one input device would work
better than
another.
- Tell from your experiences which device you prefer
to work with and which one you would like to
work with that you have not yet had the opportunity.
Using your own experience, the Interactive Guides,
the Readings and/or research as a foundation for
this discussion, offer your thinking on the above
topic. This does not have to be a long essay but
a brief discussion on your part concerning some of
the issues in using input devices.
|
| |
|
Rationale:
|
The review is included in my
portfolio to demonstrate my understanding of input devices
and how they can enhance or detract from the creation
of technology applications elements. It is a short description
of the Optical Mouse from Microsoft and the Wacom Tablet.
I use both of these, depending on the amount of typing
required. The Optical Mouse is easier to use when alternating
between typing sequences and keyboarding; the Wacom device
makes selection, highlighting, and dragging much easier.
Alternating between the Wacom and keyboarding can be
exhausting to the muscles of the forearm and wrist because
of the fine, finger control needed for both tasks. |
| |
|
Implications for Future:
|
The Wacom tablet is my preferred
method of input for my laptop. Students need to be aware
that there are alternate input devices available that
could increase their productivity, |
| |
|
Reviewers Comments:
|
Your web review as great.
I loved the format!! |
Reviewer Name:
|
Karen Fuller |
Date Reviewed:
|
11/18/2002 |
Reviewers Title:
|
TATC Student |
| Top
of Page |
|