|
Home
Goals
Observation
Reflection
Standards
I-XI
- I,
II,
III,
IV,
V,
- VII,
VIII,
IX,
X,
XI
Standard's
Matrix
Site
Map |
Observation
Reflection:
For
my observation, I observed during a full day Flash MX training session
titled "The Joy of Online Learning with FLASH" held for
the Arlington ISD Technology Applications teachers. The class was
structured and prepared by Joy Rousseau and was held on November
11, 2002.
During
the observation, I was able to note the following important points:
- All
resources were provided to us in handout format. We were allowed
to work off of the handouts and were expected to always keep an
eye ahead. Unfortunately the teacher
did not give credit for the resource of the work and immediately
lost credibility from us because we were aware of the fact that
project that she was providing to us was a canned project prepared
by Macromedia.
- Students
were given small demonstration portions and then were required
to continue the lesson from the point that was demonstrated on.
This particular technique didn't bother
me because I am very comfortable with Flash, but for the students
that had absolutely no knowledge of the program, it was frustrating
and a little too difficult.
- Terms
referring to the technology were used throughout the class. Some
terms were introduced and explained in depth but others were taken
for granted as understood. This was
a point that I noticed threw the newer students off. No knowledge
of the program made it very difficult for these students and brought
the class to a grinding halt at times.
- Digital
graphic format was briefly touched on and commented on as being
very important but no firm instruction was given on it. This
hurt the students who never dealt in the area of image opitmization
and so it made their file sizes larger than they ideally would
have been.
- Multimedia
concepts and techniques were introduced and enforced in the class:
- Students
in the class that felt they had a grasp of the concept being
taught were asked to demonstrate the concept on the demonstration
computer for the rest of the class to benefit from. This
was a good teaching technique because the teacher sometimes
spoke above the heads of the students and hearing the technique
in the words of another student sometimes made it easier to
understand and grasp.
- Students
were expected to stay with the teacher at the majority of
times unless she asked us to work at our own pace. This
created a problem because the entire packet was provided to
us at one time and this sometimes poses a problem with the
students who are ahead of the rest. Because of the desire
to complete the work, there were many students who worked
ahead and were not able to be as supportive to the students
around them because they were concerned with completing their
own project work.
- The multimedia concepts
introduced and put into use were:
- timeline, toolbar,
stage and library usage
- keyframes and
frames
- motion tweening
- alpha tweening
- sound integration
- button preparation
and usage
- action scripts
- previewing and
testing
- There were a few web
mastering techniques introduced in the class. We went over preparation
for a web page using Flash, usage of buttons in a web page and
using text files for text sections in Flash. I
believe that this area was very vague and could have been presented
more completely. The particular area that may have been confusing
for some was the use of text files for use with Flash. There are
many people that have no idea of the use of a text editor like
notepad for use in web pages and this was definitely an area that
was not explained well at all by the teacher. This resulted in
a little more confusion from the beginning teachers.
Generally,
I believe that this class was more well thought-out and prepared
for than the previous one held on September 16, 2002. In that particular
class the teacher was prepared to teach us lessons that she had
prepared specifically for Flash 5. Because of this miscommunication
the class was filled with "If this was in Flash 5 the case
would be..." Also, the teacher had little exposure to Flash
MX and honestly was not qualified to teach the class. The class
went on anyway.
I believe
that in a class such as this, a teacher should have structured lessons
that have been tested for accuracy and tested again. If you are
going to be teaching a complicated software like Flash MX you should
always be prepared for all of the little questions.
The introduction
portion of the class was weak as far as I was concerned and I felt
that there was so much more that the use of materials that were
prepared by someone else with no credit to the creator was plagiarizing.
I was not alone in this.
Overall,
I do believe that I came away with some techniques and concepts
that I was eager to apply to my own class, but the overall structure
of the class was weak and did not keep all knowledge levels in mind.
Generally, it was a good learning experience for myself because
the teacher was very sure of her own skills but I'm not quite sure
that she was aware of her students' skills. This is an area that
all teachers should keep in mind--teach to the beginners and bring
them up to speed unless you are aware that everyone already has
good exposure and experience with the software and terms.
|
|